← All Authorities
Australia barnes v addyde facto directorconstructive trust

Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2)

Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) (2012) 200 FCR 296; [2012] FCAFC 6
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFull Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Year2012
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The Full Federal Court comprehensively restated Australian accessory (Barnes v Addy) and fiduciary liability: the second-limb 'knowing assistance' claim continues to require knowledge of a dishonest and fraudulent design (the Australian knowledge-based test affirmed in Farah Constructions v Say-Dee, not the English objective-dishonesty test of Royal Brunei v Tan), and a person who acts as a director in substance (a de facto or shadow director/officer) is subject to fiduciary and statutory directors' duties.

Area of Law

trusts

Related Cases

Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85
Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 90

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL...