← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case remoteness

Hadley v Baxendale

(1854) 9 Exch 341
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Exchequer
Year1854
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Damages in contract are limited to losses arising naturally from the breach or within the reasonable contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting (two-limb remoteness test).

Key Principle

remoteness of damages in contract; two limbs (natural consequences and special knowledge)

Area of Law

Contract — Breach and Remedies

Related Cases

Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67

The UKSC reformulated the penalty clause rule, replacing the Dunlop test with a legitimate interest test asking whether the clause is extravagant or unconscionable relative to that interest.

Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc (The Achilleas) [2008] UKHL 48

Remoteness of damage in contract may depend on whether the defendant assumed responsibility for the type of loss, not merely reasonable contemplation.

Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [2007] UKHL 12

Where a charterparty was repudiated, damages are assessed by reference to subsequent events that would have terminated the contract early, reducing the award accordingly.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Hadley v Baxendale and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Hadley v Baxendale