← All Authorities
United States uncategorised

Halliburton Co v Erica P John Fund Inc

573 U.S. 258 (2014)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance in securities fraud class actions may be rebutted by defendants at the class certification stage with evidence of no price impact.

Key Principle

securities fraud; fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance may be rebutted at class certification stage

Area of Law

Securities

Related Cases

Janus Capital Group Inc v First Derivative Traders 564 U.S. 135 (2011)

Under SEC Rule 10b-5, only the maker of a false statement—the entity with ultimate authority over its content—can be primarily liable for securities fraud.

Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos 605 U. S. 280 (2025)
Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo 603 U.S. ___ (2024)

Chevron U.S.A. v NRDC overruled; courts must independently interpret statutes and may not defer to agency interpretations solely because of statutory ambiguity.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Halliburton Co v Erica P John Fund Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Halliburton Co v Erica P John ...