← All Authorities
United Kingdom abuse of processdiscontinuance cpr 38.7henderson

HHJ Matthews in Ward v Hutt

[2018] 1 WLR 1789
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court (Chancery Division)
Year2018
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A second claim brought against the same defendants on substantially the same subject matter as an earlier claim that was discontinued is liable to be struck out where the claimant has not obtained the court's permission required by CPR 38.7, and may in any event be an abuse of process under the rule in Henderson v Henderson.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of HHJ Matthews in Ward v Hutt and how it applies to your situation.

Explain HHJ Matthews in Ward v Hutt