← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case undue influenceguarantees and indemnitiesmortgages

Hong Leong Finance Ltd v Tan Gin Huay

[1999] 1 SLR(R) 755
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year1999
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A lender is put on constructive notice of undue influence where the surety relationship is known and must take reasonable steps to ensure the surety's consent is freely given.

Key Principle

The SGCA considered the enforceability of a mortgage against a party who signed under undue influence; the lender is put on constructive notice of undue influence where the surety relationship is known and must take reasonable steps.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Hong Leong Finance Ltd v Tan Gin Huay and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Hong Leong Finance Ltd v Tan G...