← All Authorities
United Kingdom bankruptcy annulmenttrustee remunerationcosts

Howard v Savage

[2006] EWHC 3693 (Ch), [2007] BPIR 1097
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court (Chancery Division)
Year2007
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

On annulment of a bankruptcy the court retains a discretion over the trustee's remuneration and expenses, and a trustee who has misled the court as to the interest and charges due to him may have his costs and remuneration assessed and reduced to a sum proportionate to the work properly done.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Howard v Savage and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Howard v Savage