← All Authorities
United States
removaldiversity jurisdictionjoinder
Inc. v. Palmquist
607 U.S. 421 (2026)
Key Principle
Where a case is removed on diversity grounds but a non-diverse defendant was properly joined, the federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction; a district court's erroneous interlocutory dismissal of that defendant does not cure the defect, and the case must be remanded to state court notwithstanding a completed trial and final judgment.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Inc. v. Palmquist and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Inc. v. Palmquist