The 'at the expense of' requirement in unjust enrichment demands a direct transfer of value from claimant to defendant, and absence of basis is not the English unjust factor approach.
trusts
Prenuptial agreements set aside for unconscionability and undue influence where inequality of bargaining power existed between the parties.
A casino operator's mere knowledge of a patron's pathological gambling does not constitute unconscionable conduct absent deliberate exploitation of that special disadvantage.
A supplier's high-pressure door-to-door sales tactics targeting elderly women constituted unconscionable conduct under the Australian Consumer Law.
Get a detailed analysis of Investment Trust Companies v Revenue and Customs Commissioners and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Investment Trust Companies v R...