← All Authorities
United States Leading Case jurisdiction

J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd v Nicastro

564 U.S. 873 (2011)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2011
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A foreign manufacturer targeting the US market generally is not subject to personal jurisdiction in a particular state without purposeful availment of that state's market.

Key Principle

A foreign manufacturer's targeting of the United States market generally does not subject it to jurisdiction in any particular state without additional evidence of purposeful availment.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd v Nicastro and how it applies to your situation.

Explain J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd v Ni...