← All Authorities
United Kingdom rome iireflective lossforeign law

KMG International NV v Chen

KMG International NV v Chen [2019] EWHC 2389 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Commercial Court (Queen's Bench Division)
Year2019
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

The common-law rule against the recovery of reflective loss is a rule of substantive law, not of procedure, so it is not excluded from the law applicable under the Rome II Regulation; nor is it an overriding mandatory provision of English law under article 16, so it does not bar a claim governed by foreign (Dutch) law even where it would defeat the equivalent English-law claim.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of KMG International NV v Chen and how it applies to your situation.

Explain KMG International NV v Chen