United Kingdom unlawful means conspiracyinducing violation of judgment debt marexenforcement

Lakatamia Shipping Co Ltd v Morimoto

[2023] EWHC 3023 (Comm)

JurisdictionUnited Kingdom

CourtHigh Court of Justice, King's Bench Division, Commercial Court (Foxton J)

Year2023

StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A judgment creditor may recover against third parties (here Ms Tseng and Ms Morimoto) for unlawful means conspiracy and for the Marex tort of intentionally and knowingly inducing or procuring a violation of the creditor's rights in a judgment debt by concealing or dissipating assets.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)

Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)

Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lakatamia Shipping Co Ltd v Morimoto and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lakatamia Shipping Co Ltd v Mo...