← All Authorities
Singapore easements

Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v MCST Plan No 301 (Easement)

[2009] SGCA 16
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2009
StatusBinding authority

Summary

An easement of way may be acquired by implied grant where it is necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the dominant tenement.

Key Principle

An easement of way may be acquired by implied grant where it is necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the dominant tenement.

Area of Law

property

Related Cases

Zheng v Cai (2009) 239 CLR 446

In assessing personal injury damages, gratuitous or benevolent payments received by the plaintiff from third parties are not to be deducted from the damages award.

Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (Knowing Receipt) [2007] HCA 22

Knowing receipt of trust property requires actual knowledge of the breach of trust or circumstances that indicate impropriety to establish constructive trust liability.

Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (Specific Performance) [2003] HCA 57

Equity presumptively grants specific performance of land sale contracts on the basis that land is unique, unless granting it would be unjust.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v MCST Plan No 301 (Easement) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v ...