← All Authorities
United Kingdom undue influenceunconscionable bargainderivatives mis selling

Libyan Investment Authority v Goldman Sachs International

[2016] EWHC 2530 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Chancery Division
Year2016
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Derivatives mis-selling; undue influence over sovereign wealth fund; unconscionable bargain in structured trades; Goldman's advisory relationship

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Philipp v Barclays Bank UK plc [2023] UKSC 25
Stanford International Bank Ltd v HSBC Bank plc [2022] UKSC 34
Stanford International Bank Ltd (in liquidation) v HSBC Bank Plc [2022] UKSC 34

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Libyan Investment Authority v Goldman Sachs International and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Libyan Investment Authority v ...