← All Authorities
United Kingdom constructionconcurrent conditionsput option

LLC v John Textor

[2026] EWHC 1498 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Commercial Court (KBD)
Year2026
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where a share purchaser's payment obligation under a put option is expressed as 'subject to' the seller's delivery of transfer documents, delivery and payment are concurrent conditions (a simultaneous exchange) rather than sequential, so the payer cannot avoid liability by relying on non-delivery if the seller was ready and willing to perform.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of LLC v John Textor and how it applies to your situation.

Explain LLC v John Textor