← All Authorities
United Kingdom
aggregationpolicy construction
Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co
[2003] UKHL 48; [2003] 4 All ER 43
Key Principle
An aggregation clause that allows separate losses to be treated as one where they result from 'one act or omission' (rather than a series of related acts or omissions, which the relevant clause did not include) requires a single unifying act or omission as the proximate or effective cause of the losses; multiple instances of similar mis-selling are not aggregated absent such a single originating cause.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Lloyds TSB General Insurance H...