← All Authorities
United Kingdom aggregationpolicy construction

Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co

[2003] UKHL 48; [2003] 4 All ER 43
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHouse of Lords
Year2003
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

An aggregation clause that allows separate losses to be treated as one where they result from 'one act or omission' (rather than a series of related acts or omissions, which the relevant clause did not include) requires a single unifying act or omission as the proximate or effective cause of the losses; multiple instances of similar mis-selling are not aggregated absent such a single originating cause.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lloyds TSB General Insurance H...