← All Authorities
United Kingdom

Lomas v JFB Firth Rixson Inc

[2012] EWCA Civ 419
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Year2012
Statusunclear

Key Principle

The ipso facto prohibition (now reflected in the Companies Act 2006) prevents counterparties from terminating derivatives contracts solely because a company enters administration; but flawed asset provisions are enforceable.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Philipp v Barclays Bank UK plc [2023] UKSC 25
Stanford International Bank Ltd v HSBC Bank plc [2022] UKSC 34
Stanford International Bank Ltd (in liquidation) v HSBC Bank Plc [2022] UKSC 34

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lomas v JFB Firth Rixson Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lomas v JFB Firth Rixson Inc