← All Authorities
United Kingdom affidavitstatutory demandcross examination

Long v Farrer & Co and Farrer

[2004] EWHC 1774 (Ch); [2004] BPIR 1218
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice (Chancery Division)
Year2004
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

On an application turning on affidavit evidence (here a statutory demand/bankruptcy context), a court will not normally resolve disputed issues of fact without cross-examination, but it may reject written evidence as untrue without cross-examination where, on all the evidence (in particular contemporaneous documents properly understood), that evidence is 'simply incredible'.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Long v Farrer & Co and Farrer and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Long v Farrer & Co and Farrer