← All Authorities
United Kingdom security for costsimpecuniosity

Longstaff International v Baker and McKenzie

[2004] EWHC 1852 (Ch); [2004] 1 WLR 2917
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court (Chancery Division)
Year2004
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

For security for costs against a company under CPR 25.13(2)(c), 'inability to pay' is assessed by reference to whether the claimant could pay a costs order within the normal timescale (typically 14 days) from cash or readily realisable assets; inability to pay promptly suffices even if the claimant might ultimately be able to pay.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Longstaff International v Baker and McKenzie and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Longstaff International v Bake...