United States Leading Case physical occupationper se ruleright to exclude

Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.

458 U.S. 419 (1982); 102 S. Ct. 3164; 73 L. Ed. 2d 868

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year1982

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A permanent physical occupation of property authorised by government is a per se taking requiring just compensation, however minor the occupation and whatever the public benefit.

Area of Law

Land & Property

Related Cases

Dolan v. City of Tigard 512 U.S. 374 (1994); 114 S. Ct. 2309; 129 L. Ed. 2d 304

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council 505 U.S. 1003 (1992); 112 S. Ct. 2886; 120 L. Ed. 2d 798

Nollan v. California Coastal Commission 483 U.S. 825 (1987); 107 S. Ct. 3141; 97 L. Ed. 2d 677

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhat...