← All Authorities
United States Leading Case exactionsdedicationunconstitutional conditions

Nollan v. California Coastal Commission

483 U.S. 825 (1987); 107 S. Ct. 3141; 97 L. Ed. 2d 677
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year1987
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A permit condition demanding dedication of a property interest (an exaction) is an unconstitutional taking unless there is an 'essential nexus' between the condition and the legitimate state interest the development burdens.

Area of Law

Land & Property

Related Cases

Dolan v. City of Tigard 512 U.S. 374 (1994); 114 S. Ct. 2309; 129 L. Ed. 2d 304
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council 505 U.S. 1003 (1992); 112 S. Ct. 2886; 120 L. Ed. 2d 798
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. 458 U.S. 419 (1982); 102 S. Ct. 3164; 73 L. Ed. 2d 868

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Nollan v. California Coastal C...