← All Authorities
United Kingdom asymmetric jurisdiction clauselugano conventioncross border

Lornamead Acquisitions Ltd v Kaupthing Bank

Lornamead Acquisitions Ltd v Kaupthing Bank hf [2011] EWHC 2611 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Year2011
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

An asymmetric (one-sided) jurisdiction clause in a finance agreement is valid and effective to confer jurisdiction on the English court, and the insolvency of a foreign (Icelandic) bank party did not, on the facts and timing, deprive the English court of the jurisdiction it had under the agreement and the Lugano Convention.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lornamead Acquisitions Ltd v Kaupthing Bank and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lornamead Acquisitions Ltd v K...