← All Authorities
United States Leading Case offer and acceptance

Lucy v Zehmer

196 Va. 493 (1954)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtVirginia Supreme Court of Appeals
Year1954
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A contract is judged by the outward expression of the parties; a party's secret intention not to be bound is irrelevant to formation.

Key Principle

A contract is judged by the outward expression of the parties rather than their undisclosed subjective intent; a party's secret intention not to be bound is irrelevant.

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560

On termination of a building contract, a builder may recover reasonable value of work done in restitution, subject to the contract price as a ceiling where work was performed under a valid contract.

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525

Bank late payment fees are not penalties where they represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss or protect a legitimate interest of the stipulating party.

Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85

High Court of Australia examined the principles governing rectification of written contracts for common intention and unilateral mistake in equity.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lucy v Zehmer and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lucy v Zehmer