← All Authorities
United Kingdom quantum meruitvaluationexpert evidence

Lusty v Finsbury Securities

Lusty v Finsbury Securities Ltd (1991) 58 BLR 66
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year1991
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

On a claim for payment on a quantum meruit for additional or extra-contractual work, the party claiming may adduce his own surveyor's or expert's opinion evidence as to the reasonable value of the work, though the weight the court gives such evidence is a matter for the court.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Lusty v Finsbury Securities and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Lusty v Finsbury Securities