← All Authorities
United Kingdom
formationinterpretation
Maggs v Marsh
[2006] EWCA Civ 1058; [2006] BLR 396
Key Principle
Where a contract is wholly or partly oral, the ascertainment of its terms is a question of fact, and (unlike the construction of a written contract) evidence of what the parties said and did after the contract was concluded is admissible to help determine what was actually agreed.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Maggs v Marsh and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Maggs v Marsh