← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case implied termsexpectation damages

Malik v BCCI SA

[1998] AC 20
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1998
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Contracts of employment contain an implied term of mutual trust and confidence; stigma damages are recoverable for its breach.

Key Principle

implied term of mutual trust and confidence; stigma damages recoverable

Area of Law

Employment

Related Cases

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169

Australian law does not recognise an implied duty of mutual trust and confidence in employment contracts, departing from the UK position in Malik v BCCI.

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410

The High Court considered the implication of terms into employment contracts, including whether a term of good faith or fair dealing could be implied at common law to constrain unfair dismissal.

Tadjudin v Bank of America NA (2016) 19 HKCFAR 690

An employer must not exercise contractual discretion irrationally or in bad faith; HK leading authority equivalent to Braganza on implied limitations on contractual discretion.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Malik v BCCI SA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Malik v BCCI SA