← All Authorities
Singapore deceitunlawful means conspiracycompensatory damages

MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Skaugen SE

[2020] SGCA 80
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal addressed fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud arising from falsification of marine engine fuel consumption data, and assessed resulting damages.

Key Principle

fraudulent misrepresentation; conspiracy to defraud; marine engine fuel consumption data falsification; damages assessment

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 486

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Skaugen SE and how it applies to your situation.

Explain MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Ska...