← All Authorities
United Kingdom implied representationbenchmark manipulationrescission

Marme Inversiones 2007 SL v Natwest Markets Plc & Ors

Marme Inversiones 2007 SL v Natwest Markets Plc & Ors [2019] EWHC 366 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Year2019
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A claim to rescind interest-rate swaps for implied misrepresentation as to the integrity of a benchmark rate (EURIBOR) will fail where the alleged broad implied representations cannot be derived from the bank's words or conduct and where the claimant did not in fact rely on any such representation.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Marme Inversiones 2007 SL v Natwest Markets Plc & Ors and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Marme Inversiones 2007 SL v Na...