← All Authorities
United States informed consenthuman tissuefiduciary duty

Moore v Regents of the University of California

51 Cal.3d 120 (1990)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of California
Year1990
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Physician's duty to disclose research and economic interests in patient's biological materials; informed consent extends to non-therapeutic interests

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Twitter Inc v Taamneh 598 U.S. 471 (2023)
Nestlé USA Inc v Doe 593 US 628 (2021)
Brownback v King 592 US 209 (2021)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Moore v Regents of the University of California and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Moore v Regents of the Univers...