← All Authorities
United Kingdom security for costsdiscretion

Mountain Ash Portfolio Ltd v Vasilyev

[2022] EWHC 1867 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts, London Circuit Commercial Court (Ms Lesley Anderson QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge)
Year2022
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

On an application for security for costs the court retains a broad discretion under the CPR and, where it is satisfied that the conditions are met, may order a sum that is proportionate to the realistic costs at risk and the strength or weakness of the respondent's case rather than the full sum claimed.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Mountain Ash Portfolio Ltd v Vasilyev and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Mountain Ash Portfolio Ltd v V...