← All Authorities
United Kingdom banking and financedefences to enforcement

National Bank of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon SA

[2018] EWCA Civ 1390
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales Court of Appeal
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

State Immunity Act 1978 protects central bank funds from enforcement regardless of the purpose for which those funds are held.

Key Principle

The sovereign immunity provisions in the State Immunity Act 1978 protect a central bank's funds from enforcement; the funds are immune regardless of the purpose for which they are held.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of National Bank of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon SA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain National Bank of Kazakhstan v ...