← All Authorities
United Kingdom

ParkingEye Limited v Beavis

[2015] UKSC 67
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
Year2015
Statusunclear

Key Principle

Joined with Cavendish Square Holding v Makdessi at the Supreme Court. A £85 overstay charge in a free car park was not an unenforceable penalty because the landowner had a legitimate interest in maintaining the charge beyond mere compensation for loss (efficient management of the car-park space).

Area of Law

contract

Related Cases

Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560
Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 258 CLR 525
Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (2016) 260 CLR 85

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of ParkingEye Limited v Beavis and how it applies to your situation.

Explain ParkingEye Limited v Beavis