United States statutory sellersolicitation liabilityin pari delicto

Pinter v Dahl

486 U.S. 622 (1988)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year1988

StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Section 12 liability; participant seller concept; in pari delicto defence in securities cases; statutory seller must solicit purchase motivated by own financial interest

Area of Law

securities

Related Cases

SEC v Terraform Labs Pte Ltd No. 23-cv-01346 (S.D.N.Y. 2024)

Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani 598 U.S. 759 (2023)

Goldman Sachs Group Inc v Arkansas Teacher Retirement System 594 U.S. 113 (2021)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pinter v Dahl and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pinter v Dahl