← All Authorities
United States Leading Case competition and regulation

Pirani v Slack Technologies LLC

600 U.S. 367 (2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A Section 11 plaintiff under the Securities Act must prove their shares were traceable to the allegedly defective registration statement.

Key Principle

A Section 11 plaintiff must prove shares were traceable to the allegedly defective registration statement.

Area of Law

securities

Related Cases

China Trends Holdings Ltd v Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd [2026] HKCFI 783

Court upholds Stock Exchange of Hong Kong delisting decisions where properly made, affirming deference to exchange regulatory decisions.

HKSAR v Mak Kwong Yiu & Ors [2025] HKCFA 20

CFA clarified the conditions under which disclosure obligations arise under the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing Rules in a securities context.

Christine Ruth Ong Chai Hoon v Lam Kin Chung [2025] HKCFI 3857

HK Court of First Instance dismissed investors' misrepresentation claims arising from alleged false statements made in connection with a software company IPO.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Pirani v Slack Technologies LLC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Pirani v Slack Technologies LL...