United Kingdom amendment of statements of casecase managementoverriding objective

PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov

[2020] EWHC 623 (Comm)

JurisdictionUnited Kingdom

CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)

Year2020

StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

On an application to amend a statement of case, the lateness of the application is an important but not conclusive factor, and the absence of a good explanation for the delay is not necessarily fatal where the overriding objective and the balance of justice favour allowing the amendment.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)

Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)

Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov and how it applies to your situation.

Explain PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov