← All Authorities
United Kingdom unlawful means conspiracyunjust enrichmentrome ii

PrivatBank v Kolomoisky & Ors

[2025] EWHC 1987 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts, Chancery Division (Mr Justice Trower)
Year2025
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Controllers of a bank who orchestrate the extraction of funds through sham loans to a network of shell companies they own or control are jointly and severally liable to compensate the bank for the resulting loss, with the substantive claims (including unjust enrichment) governed by the applicable foreign law under Rome II.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of PrivatBank v Kolomoisky & Ors and how it applies to your situation.

Explain PrivatBank v Kolomoisky & Ors