← All Authorities
United Kingdom implied termsgood faith and relational contractsquincecare duty

Property Alliance Group Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc

[2018] EWCA Civ 355
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales Court of Appeal
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Summary

No implied term requires a bank to set LIBOR-linked rates in good faith; LIBOR manipulation claims require proof the specific rate paid was affected.

Key Principle

The Court of Appeal held that there is no implied term requiring a bank to exercise its discretion in setting LIBOR-linked rates in good faith; LIBOR manipulation claims require proof that the specific rate paid was affected.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Property Alliance Group Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Property Alliance Group Ltd v ...