← All Authorities
United Kingdom sanctionsdefault judgment

Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima & Others

[2023] EWHC 2018 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice (Business and Property Courts, Chancery Division)
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where a party commits serious breaches of court orders for extended disclosure and then withdraws from the proceedings, the court may strike out that party's defence to a counterclaim and enter default judgment on it, the prejudice of the breaches being weighed against the interests of other parties for each distinct counterclaim.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima & Others and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Ras Al Khaimah Investment Auth...