← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case conditions warranties innominaterepudiatory breach

RDC Concrete Pte Ltd v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd

[2007] 4 SLR(R) 413
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2007
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal established the four-situations framework for termination for breach, distinguishing conditions, warranties, innominate terms, and renunciation.

Key Principle

termination for breach; four situations analysis distinguishing conditions, warranties, intermediate terms, and renunciation

Area of Law

Contract and Interpretation

Related Cases

PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 129

Limitation-of-liability clauses in commercial contracts are enforceable and subject to ordinary principles of contractual construction in Singapore.

Y.E.S. F&B Group Pte Ltd v Soup Restaurant Singapore Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 1187

Plain meaning of contractual words prevails unless surrounding context clearly demands otherwise; commercial sense alone cannot displace clear text.

Sembcorp Marine Ltd v PPL Holdings Pte Ltd [2013] 4 SLR 193

Court of Appeal laid down three-step framework for implying terms in fact: identify a gap, establish necessity, and formulate the specific term to be implied.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of RDC Concrete Pte Ltd v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain RDC Concrete Pte Ltd v Sato Ko...