← All Authorities
United Kingdom truth defenceserious harm

Rodoy v Optical Express Limited

Rodoy v Optical Express Ltd [2026] EWHC 1219 (KB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice (King's Bench Division)
Year2026
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

In a libel claim the defence of truth (substantial justification) succeeds where the defendant proves that the imputations are substantially true; serious harm to the claimant's reputation under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 does not save the claim if the defamatory imputations (here describing the claimant as a self-confessed and known fraudster and an online troll) are shown to be true.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Rodoy v Optical Express Limite...