← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case undue influenceguarantees and indemnities

Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2)

[2001] UKHL 44
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year2001
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Bank is put on inquiry where wife stands surety for husband's debts and must ensure she receives independent legal advice to avoid constructive notice of undue influence.

Key Principle

Lord Nicholls set out the framework for surety wife cases: where a wife stands surety for her husband's debts, the bank is put on inquiry and must take reasonable steps to satisfy itself that her consent was properly obtained, typically by ensuring she receives independent legal advice.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Royal Bank of Scotland v Etrid...