← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case uncategorised

Serco Ltd v Lawson

[2006] UKHL 3
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year2006
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Establishes territorial scope of ERA 1996 unfair dismissal rights, holding that expatriate workers may qualify if they have a sufficiently strong connection with Great Britain.

Key Principle

territorial scope of employment rights; ERA 1996 unfair dismissal; expatriate workers; sufficient connection with Great Britain

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Serco Ltd v Lawson and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Serco Ltd v Lawson