← All Authorities
United Kingdom unless orderscosts enforcementsecurity for costs

Siddiqi v. Aidiniantz

[2020] EWHC 699 (QB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division)
Year2020
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

An unpaid interim costs order is a serious matter, and the court may make a conditional debarring/unless order under CPR 3.1 requiring payment of the outstanding costs (or, alternatively, security for costs) on pain of the defaulting party being debarred from pursuing or defending the claim.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Siddiqi v. Aidiniantz and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Siddiqi v. Aidiniantz