← All Authorities
United Kingdom
evidencecross examinationimmigration
Singh v SSHD
Singh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2861
Key Principle
In judicial review proceedings, where there is a conflict on the evidence the facts stated in the respondent's witness evidence are generally to be accepted unless the applicant has applied to cross-examine the witness or the evidence cannot be correct; a party who wishes to challenge the accuracy of the respondent's factual account should apply to cross-examine rather than invite the court to make adverse findings on the papers.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Singh v SSHD and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Singh v SSHD