← All Authorities
United States Leading Case duty of care skill diligence s174

Smith v Van Gorkom

488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtDelaware Supreme Court
Year1985
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Delaware directors who approve a merger without adequate information act with gross negligence, defeating business judgment rule protection and breaching their duty of care.

Key Principle

duty of care; gross negligence defeats business judgment rule protection

Area of Law

Delaware Corporate Law

Related Cases

Corwin v KKR Financial Holdings LLC 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015)

Fully informed and uncoerced stockholder approval of a non-controller transaction cleanses it of fiduciary challenge and applies business judgment review.

Kahn v M&F Worldwide Corp 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014)

Under Delaware law, a controlling shareholder merger conditioned ab initio on both special committee approval and majority-of-minority vote earns business judgment review rather than entire fairness scrutiny.

In re Caremark International Inc Derivative Litigation 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996)

Directors must implement adequate information and reporting systems to satisfy their fiduciary duty of oversight; failure to do so may constitute a breach of duty.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Smith v Van Gorkom and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Smith v Van Gorkom