← All Authorities
United Kingdom civil recoveryunlawful conduct

SOCA v Namli

[2013] EWHC 1200 (QB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
Year2013
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

In civil recovery proceedings under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the statutory remedy is directed at the property itself, so the enforcement authority must prove to the civil standard that the specific property is or represents property obtained through unlawful conduct, and it is not sufficient merely to show that the respondent engaged in fraud or money laundering generally.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of SOCA v Namli and how it applies to your situation.

Explain SOCA v Namli