← All Authorities
United Kingdom

South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter

[2004] UKHL 33; [2004] 1 WLR 1953 (Porter (No 2))
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHouse of Lords
Year2004
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Reasons given for a planning (or like administrative) decision must be intelligible and adequate, enabling the reader to understand why the matter was decided as it was and what conclusions were reached on the principal controversial issues; a reasons challenge succeeds only where the deficiency gives rise to substantial prejudice.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter and how it applies to your situation.

Explain South Buckinghamshire District...