← All Authorities
United Kingdom duty of careprofessional negligencebanking and finance

Spreadex Ltd v Sekhon

[2008] EWHC 1136 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of England and Wales (Chancery Division)
Year2008
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A financial services provider offering spread betting owes a duty of care to an unsophisticated customer engaging in leveraged derivatives transactions.

Key Principle

Spread betting and duty of care; financial services provider's obligations to unsophisticated customer engaging in leveraged derivatives

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Spreadex Ltd v Sekhon and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Spreadex Ltd v Sekhon