← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case trademarks

Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Starwood Hotels (Trade Mark)

[2013] SGCA 65
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Likelihood of confusion in trade mark infringement requires a mark-similarity inquiry, a goods-similarity inquiry, and an assessment of confusion among the relevant public.

Key Principle

The test for likelihood of confusion in trade mark infringement involves a mark-similarity inquiry, a goods-similarity inquiry, and an assessment of the likelihood of confusion among the relevant public.

Area of Law

ip

Related Cases

Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd (2014) 254 CLR 337

Foreign words used as trademarks are assessed for descriptiveness in the Australian English-speaking market; Italian words for coffee were registrable as not inherently descriptive.

Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Ltd v Commonwealth (2012) 246 CLR 561

Statutory licence scheme for sound recordings validly enacted under constitutional copyright power and did not constitute an unjust acquisition of property.

Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd (2012) 248 CLR 42

An ISP that failed to act on infringement notices did not authorise subscribers' copyright infringement via BitTorrent, as it lacked the requisite control over the infringing acts.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Starwood Hotels (Trade Mark) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Staywell Hospitality Group Pty...