← All Authorities
United States Leading Case claim formsamenability and standing

Steel Co v Citizens for a Better Environment

523 U.S. 83 (1998)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1998
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Federal courts must establish subject-matter jurisdiction before reaching the merits; hypothetical jurisdiction is impermissible.

Key Principle

Hypothetical jurisdiction is impermissible; a federal court must establish its jurisdiction before addressing the merits.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Steel Co v Citizens for a Better Environment and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Steel Co v Citizens for a Bett...