← All Authorities
United Kingdom banking and financerepudiatory breachexpress terms

Sucden Financial Ltd v Fluxo-Cane Overseas Ltd

[2010] EWHC 2133 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales High Court (Commercial Court)
Year2010
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A margin call under an ISDA Master Agreement is a contractual right; failure to meet it constitutes an event of default entitling the non-defaulting party to close out and net.

Key Principle

The court held that a margin call under an ISDA Master Agreement is enforceable as a contractual right; the failure to meet a margin call constitutes an event of default entitling the non-defaulting party to close out and net.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Sucden Financial Ltd v Fluxo-Cane Overseas Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Sucden Financial Ltd v Fluxo-C...